PUBLIC RISK DIAGNOSTIC

A Diagnostic Preview of the Survivor Alignment Index (SAI)

Spot Your Public Surface Vulnerabilities in 10 Quick Checks.

Most donor drop-offs and public media scandals don't happen because of bad intentions they stem from unnoticed public surface risks.

Below is a 10-point diagnostic preview derived from our 100-Point Survivor Alignment Index. These are binary, verifiable checks that donors, journalists, and critics can test on your website right now.

  • No internal documents or passwords required.

  • No staff paperwork or interviews needed.

  • Simply check YES or NO based on what is publicly clickable on your website today.

THE 10-POINT DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST

I. Narrative Accuracy & Claim Integrity

  1. Beneficiary Counting Logic:
    Does your website publish a clear, public explanation defining how you calculate total beneficiary numbers for example, distinguishing between direct medical care recipients and indirect community members?

  2. Attributed Quotes:
    Are beneficiary or community quotes in your public materials attributed to a specific role, location, or project context rather than appearing as anonymous, decontextualised statements?

II. Visual Dignity & Representation Standards

  1. Stock Photo Ban:
    Does your website explicitly ban generic stock photography for field representation?

  2. Children Depicted Safely:
    Across all active campaigns, are children fully clothed, in safe environments, and engaged in normal/positive activities with no staged misery, dirtied faces, or artificial distress?

III. Consent Lifespans & Image Rights

  1. Removal Procedure:
    Does your website publish a clear procedure detailing how community members or photographed subjects can request the removal, updating, or correction of their images or stories?

  2. Consent Separate from Aid:
    Does your published consent policy explicitly state that media consent is collected as a separate, independent step strictly unlinked from the delivery of humanitarian aid or services?

IV. Operational & Financial Transparency

  1. Financial Report Access:
    Is your latest complete annual financial report available to download directly without requiring an email address, registration, or paywall?

  2. Local Partner Financial Flows:
    Does your public financial reporting show specific financial flows, allocations, or partnerships with local organisations and community groups in your project countries?

V. Institutional Trajectory & Public Proof

  1. Active Agents Narrative:
    Does your public narrative consistently position local communities and partners as active agents and decision-makers rather than passive recipients of aid?

  2. Case Studies of Failure:
    Does your website provide clear, written case studies analysing past project challenges or programmatic failures?

INTERPRETING YOUR SCORE

  • 8 - 10 Points (Low Exposure):
    Strong baseline public transparency. Your website demonstrates solid defensive shielding against public scrutiny and is on track for full verification.

  • 6 - 7 Points (Moderate Exposure - Basic Threshold):
    Active blind spots detected. You meet the absolute minimum baseline, but missing policy footers or verification links leave room for donor questions and narrative disconnects.

  • Under 6 Points (Critical Exposure - Action Required):
    High public risk. A score under 6 out of 10 places your organisation below the minimum passing threshold for ethical alignment (60 points). Your public surface lacks structural policies, leaving your funding exposed to immediate external criticism.

See a Sample Report (PDF)

CHOOSE YOUR ENGAGEMENT TRACK

1. Rapid Independent Surface Audit (14 Business Days)

For organisations seeking a swift external review of active public websites, digital footprints, and campaign media.

  • Scope: Targeted qualitative surface evaluation across core public indicators.

  • Requirements: 0 internal document requests or staff interviews—we audit strictly what is publicly visible.

  • Delivery:14 Business Days express turnaround.

  • Deliverables: Board-ready Executive Surface Risk Report and gap summary.

2. Donor Trust Shield: Initial Review (90-Day Comprehensive Evaluation)

Our flagship 360° qualitative review evaluating deep institutional storytelling, field-level representation standards, and public-facing communications across all 100 points of the Survivor Alignment Index (SAI).

  • Scope:90-Day (3-Month) comprehensive evaluation cycle.

  • Requirements: 0 internal document requests—strictly external surface and published materials.

  • Deliverables: Full Board-Ready Risk Report, 100-point indicator breakdown, and formal issuance of the Document of Alignment & Seal of Integrity (for qualifying entities).

3. The 6-Month Realignment Mandate

For organisations scoring under 60 points or proactively looking to rebuild their public policy guardrails, consent lifespans, and visual standards from the ground up.

  • Scope: Hands-on strategic partnership with leadership and communications teams.

  • Focus: Developing binding visual ethics codes, 48-hour recall protocols, 12-month consent lifespans, and transparent reporting frameworks.

  • Outcome: Comprehensive structural alignment to ensure your public surface confidently passes formal verification.

4. Institutional Portfolio Reviews

Custom multi-brand or portfolio-wide evaluations for foundations, multi-donor trusts, and international networks overseeing several partner organizations or regional chapters.

COMMISSIONING DESK

General Inquiries & Executive Briefings

To initiate an audit or request a strategic consultation, please submit your inquiry directly to our primary advisory desks:

Primary Advisory Desk:
inquiries@aletheiatutela.com

Confidentiality Commitment:

All inquiries and evaluation results are handled under strict confidentiality. ALETHEIA TUTELA never publishes, leaks, or shares audit scores or risk reports of non-aligned entities.

SOVEREIGN OVERSIGHT & DIPLOMATIC INTAKE

ASSESSMENT & OFFICIAL MANDATE

If an international health partner or foreign entity operating within your borders fails to meet core transparency and dignity benchmarks, their presence poses a systemic reputational and ethical risk to your nation.

Protect Your Sovereign Integrity

Commission a comprehensive surface audit under the full Survivor Alignment Index (SAI) matrix to ensure all international activities, media campaigns, and field deployments align strictly with national interests, local attribution, and sovereign standards.